Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ È°ÁÖ À̵¿½Ã ºê¶óÄÏ ÆøÀÌ ºê¶óÄÏ°ú È£¼± »çÀÌÀÇ ¸¶Âû·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú

The effect of bracket width on frictional force between bracket and arch wire during sliding tooth movement

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2004³â 34±Ç 3È£ p.253 ~ 260
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ¿øö/Choi WC ±èÅ¿ì/¹ÚÁÖ¿µ/°ûÀçÇõ/³ªÈ¿Á¤/¹ÚµÎ³²/Kim TW/Park JY/Kwak JH/Na HJ/Park DN

Abstract

Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ È°ÁÖ À̵¿½Ã ±³Á¤¿ë ºê¶óÄÏ°ú È£¼± »çÀÌÀÇ ¸¶Âû·ÂÀº ¸¹Àº ¿äÀεé, ¿¹¸¦ µé¸é ºê¶óÄÏ°ú È£¼±ÀÇ Å©±â, ÇüÅ ±×¸®°í Àç·á, °áÂû¹æ¹ý ±×¸®°í ºê¶óÄÏ-È£¼±°£ °¢µµ µî°ú °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·± ¿äÀÎµé ´ëºÎºÐ¿¡ °üÇÏ¿© ¸íÈ®ÇÑ °á·ÐÀÌ ³»·ÁÁ® ÀÖÁö¸¸ ºê¶óÄÏ ÆøÀÌ ¸¶Âû·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú¿¡ °üÇؼ­´Â ³í¶õÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù.
À̹ø ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÓ»ó¿¡¼­¿Í ºñ½ÁÇÑ ¸ðÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ À̵¿½Ã ºê¶óÄÏ ÆøÀÌ ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â ¸¶Âû·ÂÀÇ ¾ç¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú¸¦ Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇØ °í¾ÈµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÆøÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ ¼¼°¡Áö ºê¶óÄÏ (0.018x0.025 standard) Áï Á¼Àº °Í (2.40mm), Áß°£ °Í (3.00mm), ±×¸®°í ³ÐÀº °Í(4.25mm) µîÀ» 0.016x0.022 ½ºÅ×Àη¹½º ½ºÆ¿ È£¼±°ú ÇÔ²² »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼¼°¡Áö ºê¶óÄÏ-È£¼± Á¶ÇÕµéÀº ºÐ¼Ó 0.5mm·Î 4ºÐµ¿¾È ÀåÄ¡¿¡¼­ ¿òÁ÷À̵µ·Ï ÇÏ¿´°í °¢°¢ 7ȸ¾¿ ¹Ýº¹ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ý¹°ÇÐÀûÀÎ »óŸ¦ ÀçÇöÇϱâ À§ÇØ Ä¡¾Æ Ä¡Á¶ ¸ðÇüÀº Ä¡±Ù¸·°ú À¯»çÇÑ Åº¼ºÀ» °®´Â Àç·á¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â °£Á¢¹ýÀ¸·Î Á¦À۵Ǿú´Ù. °Ô´Ù°¡ °áÂû·ÂÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ºê¶óÄÏ¿¡ ·¹ÁøÀ» µ¡ºÙ¿©¼­ °í¹«·Î °áÂûÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ºê¶óÄÏ ÆøÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸»óÇØÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù:
1. °¢ ºê¶óÄÏ-È£¼± Á¶ÇÕÀÇ ÃÖ´ë ¸¶Âû·ÂÀº;
Á¼Àº°Í(2.40mm):68.0¡¾94.69 gmf
Áß°£°Í(3.00mm):72.7¡¾54.98 gmf
³ÐÀº°Í(4.25mm):72.5¡¾94.54 gmf
2. È£¼±ÀÌ ºê¶óÄÏ ½½·ÔÀ» Áö³ª¼­ ³ª¾Æ°¥¼ö·Ï ¸¶Âû·ÂÀº Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
3. ANOVA »çÈÄ°ËÁ¤ °á°ú ÀÓ»ó°ú ºñ½ÁÇÑ ¸ðÀÇ ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ ºê¶óÄÏ ÆøÀº ¸¶Âû·Â¿¡ ¾Æ¹«·± ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p£¾0.05).

Frictional force between the orthodontic bracket and arch wire during sliding tooth movement is related to many factors, such as the size, shape and material of both the bracket and wire, ligation method and the angle formed between the bracket and wire. There have been clear conclusions drawn in regard to most of these factors, but as to the effect of bracket width on frictional force there are only conflicting studies.
This study was designed to investigate the effect of bracket width on the amount of frictional forces generated during clinically simulated tooth movement. Three different widths of brackets (0.018x0.025"standard), narrow (2.40mm), medium (3.00mm) and wide (4.25mm) were used in tandem with 0.016x0.022" stainless steel wire. Three bracket-arch wire combinations were drawn on for 4 minutes on a testing apparatus with a head speed of 0.5mm/min and tested 7 times each. To reproduce biological conditions, dentoalveolar models were designed with indirect technique using a material with similar elastic. properties as periodontal ligament (PDL). In addition, to minimize the effect of ligation force, elastomer was used with added resin, which was attached to the bracket to make up for the discrepancies of bracket width.
The results were as follows:
1. Maximum frictional force for each bracket-arch wire combination was:
Narrow (2.40mm) : 68.09¡¾4.69 gmf
Medium (3.00mm) : 72.75¡¾4.98 gmf
Wide (4.25mm) : 72.59¡¾4.54 gmf
2. Frictional force was increased with more displacement of wire through the bracket slot.
3. The ANOVA post-hoc test showed that the bracket width had no significant effect on frictional force when tested under clinically simulated conditions (P£¾0.05).

Å°¿öµå

Bracket width;Frictional force;ºê¶óÄÏ Æø;¸¶Âû·Â

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed